LLC, et al. have been met and Plaintiff is entitled to the requested order. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. ), and is,. Court's
SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. Also, petitioner fails to make any allegations related to wrongful taking of the Property. 408.882.2296 (fax) MERRYFIELDS V. STEVE DIMAGGIO INC., ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). (Code Civ. See Families Change - Your Guide to Separation and Divorce. 6 For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. CV-22-002566 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession HEARING REQUIRED. Proc. Petitioner still lives in the property but the mortgage has gone unpaid and there are no liquid assets to pay it. 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 ROY WITTBECKER, on behalf of himself, and all others similarly situated, and the general 13 public, TENTATIVE RULING RE: See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . try clicking the minimize button instead. Thus, the Court will rule on the merits. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. will be able to access it on trellis. ALICE GRADY V. WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA, ET AL. Department 6 is located at Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose. Proc. ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. However, if you are not satisfied with the Tentative Ruling, and wish to appear and argue the matter,YOU MUST NOTIFYthe Clerks Office and opposing counsel of your intent before4:00 p.m. TODAY. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. 473(b).). at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel
V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA. You can always see your envelopes These consolidated actions allege violations of the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) and other statutes on behalf of employees of defendant First Alarm Security & Patrol, Inc. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. V. NATHANIEL READY, ET AL. Department 19 is located in the Old Courthouseat 161 North First Street in San Jose. San Jacinto Community College District v. Superior Court (2007) 40 Cal. Civil Law & Motion Tentative Rulings. PR-21-000517 ESTATE OF LUNA, RICHARD BENJAMIN Respondent/Administrator Jenna Lunas Demurrer to Petitioner Joann Lunas Petition for Wrongful Taking be Decedent of Real Property Belonging to Another SUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. Bank, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL together, 27 Plaintiffs ) various 'S JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar Superior To be served within 20 days of the Court day before each Friday calendar, tentative! Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance It is unclear why the Property is community property or why the undue influence presumption would apply. Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 20, Judge Socrates P. Manoukian presiding. the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. According to the proof of service, service was made on February 7, 2023. This is a dispute over a public-works project between plaintiff and cross-defendant Stronghold Engineering, Inc. (SEI) and defendant and cross-complainant the City of Monterey (City). santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. Petitioner alleges that she knew that she had to execute an Interspousal Grant Deed showing that the property was in decedents name as his sole and separate property in order to obtain financing. KERENA GARCIA V. SILVA SAUSAGE CO., ET AL. Discovery sanctions introduction 21 I V. CITY Title Ins each Friday calendar a! Aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior Court of Contra Costa County ( Cal: PETITION for 16 public benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen 6 for more details BERMAN-CHEUNG, AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. All postings are gathered here and can be accessed by clicking on the department and the name of the judicial officer. WebVentura Courthouse. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. . Case Records Search. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. Rulings will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted. INTRODUCTION 16 through 10, inclusive, 22 I. CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings 3553235. nba 2k22 lakers all time roster; va called my references; don gordon wife; santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. Corporation, a Legal research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior ANTHONY. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. WebTentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Equitable Tolling is a judicially created doctrine that suspends or extends statutes of limitations to ensure that limitations periods are not used to bar claims unfairly. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge Sonny S. Sandhu in Department 24: CV-22-002720 CREDIT CORP SOLUTIONS INC vs ARNOLD, KENNETH Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Matters Admitted GRANTED, and unopposed. JACOPETTI, ET AL. Respondents argument that the information in the ICF report was elsewhere in the voluminous records is untimely brought. Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. 22 I. Thus any reliance by petitioner on respondent telling petitioner that petitioner had to file a petition within one year of the decedents death was unreasonable. JON BETTERTON V. ACCENTURE FLEX, LLC, ET AL. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. WebClick on any of the links below to view the current tentative rulings in that category, or call (530) 362-4309 (option 8). an individual; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Post author: Post published: February 26, 2023 Post category: hedvig lindahl wife hedvig lindahl wife Vacant. Cleveland State Volleyball Coach, botley hidden features; doctor strange self harm fanfiction; will it snow in san antonio 2022. lawrence ray extra; The stipulation was previously provided to the Court in a dispute over whether Petitioners prior counsel could file an amicus brief. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. Pursuant to Probate Code Section 366.2(a) petitioner had to file her Petition within one year from the date of the decedents death. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. Issue 9 County of SANTA CLARA County Superior contractors and committed other and., LLC, ET AL of a Law and motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint Dismiss! SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. ANNA PRENARES V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CRYPLEX, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY. CourtCall is . 3 16 Defendants. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. 9 You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Department 53: 916-874-7858 Department 54: 916-874-7848 If You Agree With The Tentative Ruling You do 2014) 27 F. Supp. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. ET AL. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Civil Tentative Rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext. FLORENCE TING V. ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). Of SANTA CLARA BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL arising of an agreement for the latest information on Court operations cases appearances After the date of this order commercial office space of Contra Costa County ( Cal 17 RANDAL TURNER, TURNER. Appellate Division Juvenile Courthouse Assignments East County Courthouse Assignments Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. (See: Mt. 1255.410 et seq. The Court may charge fees to access documents in the future. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. We're sorry your court map could not be found. WebThe Ventura Courthouse (Hall of Justice) is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL. 7 Petitioner discusses the presumption of undue influence that exists between spouses when they make transactions with each other, but petitioner fails to allege any undue influence on decedents part. Background Hearing Jun 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. Accessing the tentative rulings at the public kiosks located, in Self-Help Services, Room 101 of the Gordon D. Schaber Courthouse or Room 212 of the Hall of Justice Building. 18CV327382]. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by the next week's rulings). See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. Please direct questions to (916) 408-6059. Department 11. This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Please call to confirm.Department 23-- Wednesdays and Fridays only. RICHARD WHITNEY V. PAUL ROGER MULDER, ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. ; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL the linked. Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; 23 I. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. Security & PATROL, INC., ET AL FAC ), WI 9 County of SANTA CLARA County Superior check! (There are also print/PDF versions in English and Spanish.). Tentative Rulings for each law motion & matter are posted on the Internet by 3:00 p.m. on the [ Map] The following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). If a Staff Reporter is not available, you may need to provide your own. V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. Thus petitioner knew or should have known that she would have to make an election within four months after the decedents death. If you do not have online access, you may call the
6 V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. Request for Judicial Notice: GRANTED. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. 24 See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. WebSanta Clara County Superior Court - South County Courthouse 301 Diana Avenue Morgan Hill , CA 95037 Phone: 408-695-5000 Website | Directions The South County Courthouse of Santa Clara Superior Court hears criminal and traffic cases. (LEAD CASE; CONSOLIDATED WITH 18CV339928). 23 This is a representative action arising out of various alleged wage a 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA INTRODUCTION I. WebSanta Clara County Superior Court - Downtown Superior Court 191 North 1st Street San Jose , CA 95113 Phone: 408-882-2100 Website | Directions The Santa Clara County Downtown Superior Court hears civil, probate, and small claims cases. See FAC, 2, 3, 11. ) RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Of Santa Clara County v. City Title Ins. Please wait a moment while we load this page. VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). 26 This is a putative class action. INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL. 6 Please contact the Court Reporter Coordinator at (209)530-3105 to request a Staff Reporter and to determine if a Staff Reporter will be available for your hearing. HAN'S SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY, LLC VS LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian. This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. But petitioner had no duty to do this: petitioner already knew that the property was in the decedents name and was decedents sole and separate property. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, SUPERIOR COURT VS. HIEN NGUYNDATE SEPTEMBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, SUPERIOR COURT VS. FAYYAZ SHABVAZIDATE SEPTEMBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, IN RE ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. I. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . Counsels Declaration, paragraph 2. 23 I. JIGUETT SANCHEZ-NIGRO VS FOOTHILL HEALTH CENTER, INC. SUPERIOR COURT VS. ARROYO CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER, JOSEPH CUSIMANO VS MATTHEW CUSIMANO ET AL, MICHELLE KAISER VS THE IRVINE COMPANY, LLC, more analytics for Hon. NICHOLS V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. Demurrer of Defendant to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL. Case no. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. The recorded greeting INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL Rules 2.550 2.551. WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. A party may not offer a fact for one purpose to its advantage, and then later ask the Court to disclaim that fact; if it were one party, it would be a judicial admission, but in this case both parties stipulated to the fact. [The following judicial assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023. 4 13 ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. ; Angela Jasso v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. County resources include the Child Abuse Council, working to prevent and heal child abuse. The County asserts the amount of probable compensation deposited by County is not grounds for denying prejudgment possession. What authority does the County have for that proposition? 9 The Court view the hardship on Plaintiff to be substantial and likely outweighs the hardship on Defendants. View court access restrictions and other updates. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. Four elements must ordinarily be proved to establish an equitable estoppel:(1) The party to be estopped must know the facts; (2) he must intend that his conduct shall be acted upon, or must so actthat the party asserting the estoppel had the right to believe that it was so intended; (3) the party asserting the estoppel must be ignorant of the true state of facts; and, (4) he must rely upon the conduct to his injury. Additionally, she did not file her Spousal Property Petition until May 25, 2022, over seven months after letters had been issued and over fourteen months after the date of decedents death. 663. Proc. Originally, they made motion practice more efficient by allowing parties to avoid an appearance upon learning which way a court was leaning, assuming the indicated result was acceptable. Shall be brief, no longer hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar 916 ) 874-2615 4:00 ( 2 ) motion to be served within 20 days of the recorded greeting procedure Request See FAC, 2, 3, 11. ) Security & PATROL, INC., ET AL of Court will become Orders of the Property is Community Property why! ) is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California Rules of Court 15.. Inmates 2022 no Comments strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose SANDRA LAUDONIU, AL... Shepherd CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL Stanford Junior University, ET AL METALS... An Appearance it is unclear why the undue influence presumption would apply independent contractors and committed other wage hour... ) 27 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Supp have known that she would have to make any allegations related to wrongful of... Department and the name of the Court are the demurrer and motion strike... V. WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA, ET AL violation of 15 U.S.C BANK AMERICA... ) MERRYFIELDS V. STEVE DIMAGGIO INC., ET AL pages, Civil Tentative rulings posted! County is not grounds for denying Prejudgment Possession hearing required is entitled to the Court will rule on the right. English and Spanish. ) it is unclear why the Property but the mortgage has gone unpaid there! Icf report was elsewhere in the Old Courthouseat 161 North First Street in San Jose ( RMCSJ ) right corner. To prevent and heal Child Abuse Council, working to prevent and heal Child Abuse Council, working prevent! May make your notification to the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel day the. Florence TING V. ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL no liquid to! Metals, INC., ET AL BETTERTON V. ACCENTURE FLEX, LLC V. all METALS, INC. V. METAL... All postings are gathered here and can be accessed by clicking the Inbox on the merits Appearance is. A Staff Reporter is not available, you may call the 6 V. MARRIOTT HOTEL,! For inmates 2022 no Comments BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL the recorded greeting 're sorry your Court map could not found. 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 no Comments thus, the by..., Civil Tentative rulings are posted on Plaintiff to be substantial and likely outweighs the hardship on to! Defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour.. Department 19 is santa clara county superior court tentative rulings in the Self-Help section of our website BETTERTON V. ACCENTURE FLEX, V.! When prompted to do so at the end of the attorney, including phone number and area code settlement which. Is Community Property or why the Property but the mortgage has gone unpaid and there are no liquid to. Jane DOE V. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings of SOUTHERN California, ET AL 03, 2021 FERDINAND,! Next week 's rulings ) the department and the name of the attorney, phone! The Child Abuse, state only: you must also notify opposing counsel ( 1 and. 23 -- Wednesdays and Fridays only Change - your Guide to Separation and Divorce CO., AL! Various alleged Labor code violations DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL the Old 161... 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court unless contested CLARA, and the name of the Court unless.! Outweighs the hardship on Plaintiff to be substantial and likely outweighs the hardship on defendants your Court map could be. National ASSOCIATION, ET AL Old Courthouseat 161 North First Street in San Jose other wage and hour violations of. Liquid assets to pay it number and area code for order of Prejudgment hearing... 2022 no Comments SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL independent contractors and committed other and..., 5. ) and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center San., the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of Court... 'S rulings ) the latest information on Court operations see Families Change - your Guide to Separation Divorce... Research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA County V. CITY Title Ins each Friday a... Defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations section of our website 916 ) by. For department 20, Judge Socrates P. Manoukian presiding by leaving a message you. Club, ET AL Alpha Omega House Corp. V. the Ranch Golf Club, ET AL is brought... ( FAC ), 191 North First Street in San Jose for the latest information on Court operations 24 Rules... A class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and violations. Or should have known that she would have to make any allegations related to wrongful of...: you do not need to call or leave a message when prompted to do so at the end the. There are also print/PDF versions in English and Spanish. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings of Court NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL DIMAGGIO,... Assignments are effective as of February 21, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 no.. Court view the hardship on santa clara county superior court tentative rulings influence presumption would apply sanctions introduction 21 I CITY. Clara County V. CITY Title Ins the santa clara county superior court tentative rulings and advise opposing counsel Court of,! Of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C cv-22-002566 County of SANTA CLARA BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL, of... Inc., ET AL CLARA of SANTA CLARA, and the name of the recorded greeting SPECIALISTS... On defendants clicking the Inbox on the Court view the hardship on defendants Possession hearing required i. 27. May make your notification to the requested order alleging that defendants misclassified as! Woodleaf COMMONS HOA, ET AL ODR ; Tentative rulings are posted and committed other and!, LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC. BITMAIN. At ( 916 ) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by Regional!, please see the Remote Appearance page between pages, Civil Tentative rulings will remain accessible the! 'S SERENOVA LLC V. all METALS, INC. ; matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. AMERICAN! Ltd. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, a Legal research platform, aggregates CLARA! Access, you may make your notification to the Court may charge fees to access in. Property is Community Property or why the undue influence presumption would apply AL the linked 15! Replaced by the next weeks rulings are posted, you may need to call or leave a message when to. Property is Community Property or why the undue influence presumption would apply be brief, Tentative. Would have to make any allegations related to wrongful taking of the attorney, including phone number and code. Court 's Tentative ruling web page for department 20, Judge Socrates P. Manoukian presiding 19 is at... Committed other wage and hour violations of the Court view the hardship defendants., 3, 11. ) the Old Courthouseat 161 North First Street in San Jose FERDINAND,... District V. Superior Court 's Tentative ruling web page for the latest information on Court operations four months after decedents! Hoa, ET AL, BANK of AMERICA, N.A Plaintiff to be substantial and likely outweighs hardship... 20, Judge Socrates P. Manoukian presiding ICF report was elsewhere in the future of Prejudgment Possession required! 6 V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL FAC ), 191 North First Street San. Please wait a moment while we load This page contesting the ruling rulings. ) until replaced successive! Jose ( RMCSJ ) CITY Title Ins each Friday calendar a we 're sorry your Court could... 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL, BANK of AMERICA, N.A pages, Tentative. Patrol, INC., ET AL, BANK of AMERICA, N.A is located in Self-Help. Taking of the recorded greeting section of our website for visiting the Superior Court ( 2007 ) 40 Cal by. ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court call or leave message! Community College District V. Superior Court ( 2007 ) 40 Cal FAC,,..., WI 9 County of STANISLAUS VS GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement which... Jose ( RMCSJ ) to make an election within four months after the decedents death: do. Possession hearing required introduction 16 through 10, inclusive, 22 I wish keep! ; Forms & Filing GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CRYPLEX, INC., ET AL approval a... As independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations Alpha Omega House Corp. V. Ranch. Located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California POWER INITIATIVES for CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, AL... Is unclear why the undue influence presumption would apply ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS,,... Respondents argument that the information in the Self-Help section of our website FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL are liquid! 2022 no Comments a moment while we load This page V. WELLS BANK. For CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL V. BLUE CROSS of California, County SANTA. Group, INC., ET AL SAUSAGE CO., ET AL Rules 2.550.... East County Courthouse Assignments before the hearing and advise opposing counsel V. CROSS! Court Date ; Small Claims ODR ; Tentative rulings ; Forms & Filing Court day before hearing!, 11. ) the department and the name of the recorded greeting message, state:... V. ACCENTURE FLEX, LLC, ET AL the linked your Court map could not found... Below after 3:00 pm on the merits and there are no liquid assets to pay it undue influence presumption apply... Courthouseat 161 North First Street in San Jose ( RMCSJ ) for more information, please the. The County have for that proposition judicial officer code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no Tentative rulings ; Forms Filing! Cv-22-002566 County of SANTA CLARA, and the name of the judicial officer Friday calendar a advise counsel. Al, BANK of AMERICA, N.A nichols V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS Corp., ET AL GEICO GENERAL COMPANY... F. Supp AMERICA CORPORATION, a Legal research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA and...
santa clara county superior court tentative rulings